In the Bible book of Genesis, verse 15, there is a description of the dimensions of the Ark: " And this is the fashion which thou shalt make it of: The length of the ark shall be 300 cubits, the breadth of it shall be 50 cubits, and the height of it shall be 30 cubits."
If L is substituted for length,
B for width, and H for height, the dimensions can be expressed as ( L x
B x H ) = V, which is the three dimensional volume.
The above diagram is the Arc of the Sun; the mathematical source of the Boat of Ra. The arc is one sixth of a circle. The radius of any circle is also the measure of one sixth of that circle. The same measure of the compass that inscribes the circle is the measure by which it is divided into six segments.
From this diagram, L is the length, which we shall use as a value of 1. If R is expressed as a fraction of L, the value of R = .1333~ (to infinity). The ratio between L and R is L/R= 7.5 or 7½. By using the Genesis numbers, we can arrive at the same ratio.
First we must average the B and H values, as there are three numbers in the Genesis equation and only two in the area formula. This is done by the equation of (B + H) / 2 = R. The result of (50 + 30) / 2 = 80 / 2 = 40 = R. Now we can apply the area formula above and find that the ratio is the same. 300 / 40 = 7.5 or 7½.
The circle divided into 360 degrees allows 6 arcs of 60 degrees each. As shown in the diagram, when the arc is drawn with straight lines, a perfect triangle is the result. This triangle is perfect because it has sides of equal length and degrees of angles that are all equal. This type of triangle is called Equilateral. The degrees of the three angles in any triangle will always total 180. In the equilateral triangle, these angles are 60 + 60 + 60 = 180. As the complete circle is 360 degrees, the triangle can be said to be half of a circle symbolically. By the same logic, a Square is made up of two triangles, and can be said to equate to a circle symbolically.
Now, let us go back again to the number 36. The ancient Egyptians regarded this number as sacred for the purpose of marking time. They knew of the decimal system before the Arabic traders brought it to the rest of the world, including the Babylonians, (who transferred it to the Hebrews,) and the Greeks. The most ancient calendar to even come close to being accurate came from the Egyptians. They recognized that the year seemed to repeat itself through the various cycles of seasons, and was therefore somewhat of a constant. Their great astronomical sciences were able to calculate the length of the year to be around 360 days, which isnt far off at all. They had their own type of months which were referred to as Decans, being based upon Deca, or Ten in Greek terms. They divided the year into 36 months of 10 days each, as the number ten was considered sacred. It was from this that the Ancient Greeks established their own calendar of 360 days, and began to use the number 360 as the number of degrees in a circle as were the number of days in a year.
The Greeks were
great mathematicians. They played with the numbers and found many interesting
things. It was the Greeks who invented Geometry as a science. Many of the
principles discovered hold true to this day. It stands as a testimony to
the simplicity and purity of arithmetic and numbers, that such things can
remain unchanged and undisputed for so many years. One thing that was discovered
when working with this new number 360, is that every number between 1 and
9 can be divided into it evenly, (Actually, every number between 1 and
12,) with the exception of the number Seven. (And Eleven, if working
through 12.)
360 / 1 = 360 360 / 2 = 180 360 / 3 = 120
360 / 4 = 90 360 / 5 = 72 360 / 6 = 60
360 / 7 = 51.428571~ 360 / 8 = 45 360 / 9 = 40
360 / 10 = 36
As can be seen from the above table, 7 is the only number that does not divide into a circle evenly. The result is not just a decimal, but an infinitive decimal; a number that repeats forever beyond the decimal point. These resulting numbers are expressed as degrees. 60 degrees, for example, is one-sixth of a circle. It should also be noted for reference that the sides of Great Pyramid in Egypt are inclined toward the peak at nearly exactly 51.5 degrees.
Another interesting function regarding divisions of a whole is that of Inverses. An inverse is a number that is the opposite in function of a multiplied number. These are usually represented as fractions. 1/1 is the same as 1. ½ is the same as .5, or "one of two equal parts".
¼ is the equivalent of .25, or one-quarter. These also follow the rule for reduction. ½ of 1 is 5. ½ of 5 is 7, as 7 + 7 = 14 and 1 + 4 = 5. ½ of 5 is also .25, and 2 + 5 = 7. Reduction to prime numbers works with numbers that are less than one as well as whole numbers.
If you play with these inverses and fractions of one, you will find the same interesting patterns as we found in the multiplication table. The fractions of 1/3, 1/6, and 1/9 all result in an infinitive decimal. If you try to break the number one into three absolutely equal parts, the best you can arrive at is 3 x .333333333333 into infinity. The whole ONE can never be one at all, but rather only .999999999999 which extends into infinity. These infinitive sequences of .333~, .666~, and .999~ are the same as we found with the same numbers in the multiplication table. They all add to numbers that equal 3, 6, or 9. 3 + 3 = 6, 6 + 6 = 3, and so on.
The other six numbers have definite decimal equivalents, with the exception of seven. We have done ½ and ¼ already. 1/8 = .125, {8 x ( 1 + 2 + 5 )}, which verifies that 8 x 8 = 1, as 6 + 4 = 10 which equals 1. 1/5 = .2, which is 2 x 5 = 1. The anomaly is 7. 1/7 = .142857~. This is also an infinitive decimal like those found with 3, 6, and 9, but this one contains a sequence of numbers rather than the same number repeated over and over. This sequence extends unto infinity. We shall break this infinitive cycle into a sequence of just one set of six numbers; 1 4 2 8 5 7. Note how similar this sequence is to that of the sequence of cell division described earlier. Same numbers in almost the same order. What is different?
The 1 and the 8
are in the same exact positions in both sequences. The 2 and 4 have traded
places with each other, as have the 5 and 7. Again the number 27 pops up,
as the same digits are used. The number 27 therefore has some relation
to not only the sequence of cell division and the nature of three dimensions,
but also to the mysticism behind the number seven. As we did before with
the sequence of cell division, this new sequence should be plotted on a
numberline:
With imagination and thoughtful insight we might gain much from these two patterns. Since we are working strictly with logic and math though, this is about as much as we can learn with the numberline. The next logical step in finding the difference between these two patterns would be to find the actual difference mathematically between them. Difference is a mathematical term which implies subtracting the smaller from the larger. If 124875 is subtracted from 142857, the actual difference is 17982.
What is this new 5 digit series of numbers? Analyses shows that this new number also adds to 27 like the two numbers it was resolved from. A digit has been lost in the process, as there are only five now instead of six. The 4 and 5 of the origin sequences have been combined to form one 9 instead. The 1 and 8 are still in the same places as before. The 2 and 7 which occupied the center squares of the multiplication table still remain, but their order is now reversed from before. Look back at the two sequences we were working with: Even though the 2 and 4 switched places, and the 5 and 7 switched places, the order that they were placed in the pattern was the same before in both patterns. 2 came before 7, and 4 came before 5. Now the 4 and 5 have become a 9, and the 2 and 7 have switched places.
What can we get from this logically? Not very much. Time to change processes again. Please remember; this work is intended to use logic rather than feeling and emotion to uncover mysteries and find answers. Many things may come to mind, and this is good. When we begin to dissect the emotional, spiritual, philosophical, and theological/theoretical meanings behind the numbers themselves: the Ten Digits of the system, these feelings will be very important and you will have to go back and revisit these descriptions and functions. For now though, we shall stick to the math, and the language of reason.
As 124875, 142857, and 17982 all have the sum of 27 as the result of reduction, we will use that standard for further resolve of this issue. 124875 divided by 27 equals 4625. 142857 divided by 27 equals 5291. 4 + 6 + 2 + 5 = 17, which is an 8. 5 + 2 + 9 + 1 also equals 17. In our study, we have learned that 8 8 should equal zero or nine. In this case it does. 17 17 = zero, but 5291 4625 = 666. The number 17982 divided by the same 27 as above results in the number 666. That is to say the difference between 124875 and 142857 is 27 x 666.
142857 124875 = 17982
17982 = 27 x 666
There is much to be learned here with the very principles of technotheology. Within this science is proof positive that could so very much help extend the reach of Christian belief if properly understood for what it is. Science has had as its sole aim to disprove the existence of GOD. The extent of science has brought the scientists to behold GOD in all his glory, yet they refuse. The purpose of religion has always been to discard knowledge in favor of faith, and they too have come to a dead end.
Gnosticism is not
evil. Ignorance is evil. Jesus told us that we had to know HIM, so they
He may know of us and petition the father in our behalf. Knowledge is not
wrong. Knowledge is the product of growth. Growth comes only to the living.
GOD is a Living GOD!!! As humanity grows, so does the perception
of GOD. As GOD grows, so does the perception of humanity. This is the way
of things. These things were righteously hidden from us until we were able
to understand them. Our technology has grown by the will of GOD to an understanding
of reality. This reality is the very reflection of GOD in everything around
us. We were never meant to follow by blind faith.
Please check out
Copyright 2000 by J.S.Graham